whiskey: be aged in oak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.68
, liquor
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, drink
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings scotch
Weight: 0.68
, bourbon
Weight: 0.66
, brandy
Weight: 0.64
, rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be aged in oak 1.00
is aged in oak barrels 0.91
be aged 0.83
have aged 0.83
is aged 0.83
taste aged 0.81
is aged longer than bourbon 0.81
be aged 12 years 0.80
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.80
taste better aged 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be aged in oak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged in oak barrels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rum, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(liquor, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged in oak barrels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged in oak barrels)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scotch, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bourbon, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is aged)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rum, is aged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rum, is aged)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(scotch, be aged 12 years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(whiskey, is aged)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(whiskey, have aged)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be aged)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is aged)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(whiskey, have aged)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is aged)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(whiskey, be aged)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, have aged)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(whiskey, is aged)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(whiskey, have aged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged in oak barrels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bourbon, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rum, is aged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged 12 years)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(whiskey, be aged in oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(liquor, be aged in oak)