whiskey: be very tasty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.68
, liquor
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, drink
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings scotch
Weight: 0.68
, brandy
Weight: 0.64
, vodka
Weight: 0.38
, beer
Weight: 0.37
, white wine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very tasty 1.00
be tasty 0.96
be golden and delicious 0.81
requires find something drinkable 0.77
be motivated by drink taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(whiskey, be very tasty)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(whiskey, be very tasty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, requires find something drinkable)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beer, be golden and delicious)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(beer, be tasty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(beer, be tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beer, be tasty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(beer, be golden and delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beer, be golden and delicious)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(whiskey, be very tasty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(whiskey, be very tasty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drink, requires find something drinkable)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, be tasty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beer, be golden and delicious)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drink, requires find something drinkable)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(whiskey, be very tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)