whiskey: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.68
, liquor
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, drink
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings scotch
Weight: 0.68
, bourbon
Weight: 0.66
, brandy
Weight: 0.64
, rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
be good for health 0.80
has quality news 0.79
taste good 0.79
is melville bad 0.78
taste better out of can 0.77
be bad for health 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(liquor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(liquor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liquor, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of can)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(liquor, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality worth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be good for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scotch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scotch, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(liquor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rum, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(scotch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(scotch, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(scotch, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(scotch, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(vodka, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(vodka, be good for health)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(whiskey, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(whiskey, has quality better)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(liquor, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(vodka, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(scotch, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(scotch, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rum, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(liquor, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)