whistling: be in illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents noise
Weight: 0.49
, trick
Weight: 0.43
, behavior
Weight: 0.42
, sound
Weight: 0.41
, childhood
Weight: 0.40
Siblings loud noise
Weight: 0.32
, loud music
Weight: 0.32
, hum
Weight: 0.31
, thunder
Weight: 0.30
, siren
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in illegal 1.00
is illegal 0.99
be in vermont illegal 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(whistling, be in illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(whistling, is illegal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(whistling, is illegal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(whistling, is illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(whistling, is illegal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(whistling, be in vermont illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(whistling, be in vermont illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(whistling, be in vermont illegal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(whistling, be in vermont illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(whistling, be in illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(whistling, be in illegal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(whistling, be in illegal)