white wine: be cheaper than red

Property	Similarity
be cheaper than red	1.00
be better than red	0.89
be sweeter than red	0.83
be typically sweeter than red wine	0.81
be more acidic than red	0.81
be typically sweeter than wine	0.77
is cheap	0.77

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(white wine, be better than red)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be better than red)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(white wine, be better than red)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(white wine, be sweeter than red)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(white wine, be sweeter than red)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be sweeter than red)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(white wine, be more acidic than red)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(white wine, be more acidic than red)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be more acidic than red)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(white wine, be better than red)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(white wine, be more acidic than red)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(white wine, be sweeter than red)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than wine)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(white wine, is cheap)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than wine)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(white wine, is cheap)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(white wine, be typically sweeter than wine)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be typically sweeter than wine)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(white wine, is cheap)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(white wine, be cheaper than red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(white wine, is cheap)

Parents	alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.74 , beverage Weight: 0.70 , red wine Weight: 0.66 , liquid Weight: 0.64 , tasting Weight: 0.62
Siblings	champagne Weight: 0.74 , red Weight: 0.38 , drinking beer Weight: 0.37 , vodka Weight: 0.37

white wine: be cheaper than red

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings