width: be related to architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents length
Weight: 0.74
, dimension
Weight: 0.65
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings inch
Weight: 0.68
, flange
Weight: 0.53
, trireme
Weight: 0.46
, diameter
Weight: 0.37
, height
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to architecture 1.00
be important to architecture 0.95
be vital to architecture 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(length, be related to architecture)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(length, be related to architecture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dimension, be vital to architecture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dimension, be important to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(width, be related to architecture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(length, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(width, be related to architecture)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dimension, be vital to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(width, be related to architecture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(width, be related to architecture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(width, be related to architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, be vital to architecture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(length, be related to architecture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dimension, be important to architecture)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(width, be related to architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, be vital to architecture)