wild animal: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, cat
Weight: 0.67
, pet
Weight: 0.66
Siblings prairie dog
Weight: 0.79
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.76
, zebra
Weight: 0.76
, deer
Weight: 0.76
, elk
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
life in forest 0.94
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.85
be at woodland 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deer, be at in forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(elk, be at forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, life in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(elk, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(elk, be at forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deer, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(deer, be at in forest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(deer, life in forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(deer, life in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wild animal, be at forest)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(elk, be at forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(deer, be at in forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(deer, life in forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)