wild animals: be called animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings wild animal
Weight: 0.40
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called animals 1.00
be like animals 0.94
be called wild animals 0.91
be like regular animals 0.83
make pets 0.83
has state pets 0.82
make good pets 0.81
taken as pets 0.81
be kept as pets 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(llama, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(llama, make good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wild animals, be called animals)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like animals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, make good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wild animals, be like animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wild animals, has state pets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wild animals, be like animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wild animals, make good pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wild animals, has state pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(wild animals, make good pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wild animals, make good pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(llama, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)