wild animals: be like regular animals

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.67
Siblings	wild animal Weight: 0.40 , saber-toothed cat Weight: 0.37 , prairie dog Weight: 0.37 , cougar Weight: 0.37 , llama Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be like regular animals	1.00
be like animals	0.90
be called animals	0.83
make good pets	0.81
be called wild animals	0.80
make pets	0.79
has state pets	0.78
be kept as pets	0.78
taken as pets	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, be called animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, be called animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(llama, make good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(wild animals, be like animals)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(wild animals, be like animals)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(wild animals, be called animals)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like animals)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(wild animals, be called wild animals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(wild animals, be called animals)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called wild animals)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(wild animals, be called wild animals)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(wild animals, make good pets)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept as pets)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(wild animals, make good pets)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept as pets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(wild animals, has state pets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept as pets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(wild animals, has state pets)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(wild animals, taken as pets)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(wild animals, make good pets)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(wild animals, taken as pets)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(wild animals, has state pets)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(wild animals, taken as pets)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept as pets)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, make good pets)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like animals)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, taken as pets)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called wild animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(llama, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)