wild animals: be under threat of extinction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat of extinction 1.00
be in danger of extinction 0.95
be under threat 0.87
be in danger 0.80
become extinct 0.76
is endangered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cougar, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cougar, is endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(prairie dog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wild animals, become extinct)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wild animals, become extinct)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, become extinct)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger of extinction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, become extinct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, be in danger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wild animals, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wild animals, is endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wild animals, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wild animals, be under threat of extinction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cougar, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be under threat of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is endangered)