wild animals: belong in wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
belong in wild 1.00
survive in wild 0.85
has state wild 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has state wild)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has state wild)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(llama, survive in wild)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(llama, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(llama, survive in wild)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wild animals, belong in wild)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, survive in wild)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state wild)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wild animals, survive in wild)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wild animals, has state wild)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wild animals, survive in wild)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wild animals, has state wild)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wild animals, survive in wild)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wild animals, has state wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has state wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(llama, survive in wild)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wild animals, belong in wild)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has state wild)