wild animals: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings wild animal
Weight: 0.40
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
make good pets 0.90
taken as pets 0.89
be kept as pets 0.88
be called animals 0.82
be like animals 0.82
be like regular animals 0.78
be called wild animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wild animals, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(llama, make good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wild animals, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wild animals, make good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wild animals, be like animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wild animals, make good pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wild animals, be called animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(wild animals, make good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept as pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wild animals, be like animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(wild animals, be called wild animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, make good pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, taken as pets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like regular animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be like animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be called wild animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wild animals, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(llama, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wild animals, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called animals)