wild animals: reproduce in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
reproduce in zoo 1.00
is zoo 0.90
put in zoo 0.89
kept in zoo 0.85
get caught n put in zoo 0.79
be kept in zoos 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wild animals, is zoo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wild animals, is zoo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wild animals, is zoo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)