wilderness: is problematic concept

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.62
, national forest
Weight: 0.61
, battle
Weight: 0.59
, land
Weight: 0.59
Siblings national parks
Weight: 0.64
, national park
Weight: 0.33
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.33
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, shoreline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is problematic concept 1.00
is problematic 0.90
is concept 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wilderness, is problematic concept)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wilderness, is problematic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(wilderness, is concept)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wilderness, is concept)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wilderness, is problematic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wilderness, is problematic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wilderness, is concept)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, is problematic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, is concept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, is problematic concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(wilderness, is problematic concept)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wilderness, is problematic concept)