wildfire: affect plant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect plant 1.00
affect plants 0.94
affect hmans 0.79
affect people 0.76
affect water cycle 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, affect people)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect plant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fire, affect people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fire, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, affect people)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect plant)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect plants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect hmans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect water cycle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect water cycle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect water cycle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect water cycle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect hmans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect hmans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect hmans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fire, affect people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(wildfire, affect plant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fire, affect people)