wildfire: be good for ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for ecosystem 1.00
affect ecosystem 0.93
harm forest ecosystem 0.87
be good for environment 0.81
be common in chaparral ecosystem 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78
be essential to savanna habitats 0.77
important to sustainability of grassland 0.75
be good for forest 0.75
help environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wildfire, help environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wildfire, help environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wildfire, help environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, help environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fire, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fire, be bad for environment)