wildfire: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.97
help environment 0.89
affect environment 0.87
be good for ecosystem 0.81
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.75
be good for forest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fire, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fire, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fire, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fire, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fire, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wildfire, help environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wildfire, help environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wildfire, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wildfire, help environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wildfire, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wildfire, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wildfire, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wildfire, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wildfire, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, help environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fire, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fire, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fire, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(wildfire, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fire, has quality bad)