wildfire: be good for forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for forest 1.00
harm forest ecosystem 0.84
spread rapidly in green forests 0.82
be constant threat in temperate woodland 0.79
be constant threat in woodland 0.78
be essential to savanna habitats 0.78
be important to grasslands 0.77
be constant threat in temperature woodland 0.77
be used for deforestation 0.76
important to sustainability of grassland 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)