wildfire: be in bc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bc 1.00
be bad in bc 0.97
get worse bc 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(wildfire, be in bc)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be bad in bc)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wildfire, be bad in bc)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be bad in bc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildfire, be bad in bc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be in bc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(wildfire, be in bc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wildfire, be in bc)