wildfire: harm forest ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm forest ecosystem 1.00
affect ecosystem 0.88
be good for ecosystem 0.87
be good for forest 0.84
be essential to savanna habitats 0.80
be common in chaparral ecosystem 0.79
spread rapidly in green forests 0.78
be important to grasslands 0.77
important to sustainability of grassland 0.76
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wildfire, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect ecosystem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wildfire, affect environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be common in chaparral ecosystem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wildfire, affect environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be good for forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildfire, be good for forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildfire, harm forest ecosystem)