wildlife: adapt to freezing conditions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to freezing conditions 1.00
adapt to conditions 0.94
adapt to conditions in antarctica 0.92
have adapt 0.80
adapt living 0.78
affect weather 0.77
adapt living in forest environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to conditions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to conditions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, have adapt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, have adapt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wildlife, have adapt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to conditions)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, have adapt)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to conditions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to freezing conditions)