wildlife: adapt to rainforest environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to rainforest environment 1.00
adapt living in forest environment 0.92
be important to environment 0.81
adapt living 0.80
adapt to conditions in antarctica 0.80
have adapt 0.79
positivaly affect environment 0.79
be good for environment 0.79
have biodiversity 0.79
be important to biodiversity 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wildlife, have adapt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, have adapt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, have adapt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to conditions in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, have adapt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)