wildlife: be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico 1.00
be affected by oil spill in gulf 0.97
be affected by oil spill 0.93
be used around mexico city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(land, be used around mexico city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(land, be used around mexico city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(resource, be affected by oil spill)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(land, be used around mexico city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(land, be used around mexico city)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(resource, be affected by oil spill)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(land, be used around mexico city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(resource, be affected by oil spill)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(wildlife, be affected by oil spill in gulf of mexico)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(land, be used around mexico city)