wildlife: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be important to environment 0.93
positivaly affect environment 0.87
adapt living in forest environment 0.80
has quality good 0.80
adapt to rainforest environment 0.79
is good thing 0.78
be good for building 0.78
be important for business 0.77
be important for economy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(resource, be important for economy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(resource, be important for economy)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(conservation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)