wildlife: be important for being

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for being 1.00
be important for human being 0.91
be important for us 0.82
be important from quality 0.79
was important to system 0.79
be important to life 0.78
being are destroyed 0.78
be important for development of country 0.78
be important for development 0.78
be important to us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to life)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development of country)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for being)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wildlife, be important for being)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)