wildlife: be important for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for us 1.00
be important to us 0.99
be important for being 0.82
be important for business 0.81
be important to life 0.80
be important from quality 0.80
be important for development of country 0.80
be important for development 0.79
be important for human being 0.79
is good thing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to life)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development of country)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for us)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to us)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)