wildlife: be important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to humans 1.00
be important for human being 0.81
be fantastic to human beings 0.79
be necessary for beings 0.78
was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians 0.78
was important to survival of different peoples 0.78
be important to planet 0.78
was important to survival of peoples in egyptians 0.77
was important to survival of peoples 0.77
be important to us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important to planet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to planet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to planet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to humans)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(resource, be necessary for beings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(resource, be important to planet)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, be necessary for beings)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for human being)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for human being)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(resource, be important to planet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(resource, be necessary for beings)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subject, be fantastic to human beings)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(resource, be important to planet)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(wildlife, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(land, was important to survival of different peoples in egyptians)