wildlife: be natural resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be natural resource 1.00
is natural resource 1.00
be considered resource 0.90
has quality resource 0.90
be natural 0.89
is natural 0.89
be considered renewable resource 0.85
be different from resources like land 0.80
is more important than physical resources 0.79
be more important than physical resources 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be more important than physical resources)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)