wildlife: is natural

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is natural 1.00
be natural 0.99
is natural resource 0.89
be natural resource 0.89
act as natural filters 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wetland, act as natural filters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(wetland, act as natural filters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, act as natural filters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, act as natural filters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(wildlife, is natural) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)