wildlife: positivaly affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
positivaly affect environment 1.00
be important to environment 0.90
be good for environment 0.87
affect economy 0.80
affect development 0.80
affect community 0.80
adapt living in forest environment 0.80
adapt to rainforest environment 0.79
affect people 0.79
affect economic development of country 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(resource, affect community)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(resource, affect community)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(resource, affect community)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(resource, affect economic development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(resource, affect community)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(resource, affect community)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, affect economic development of country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(resource, affect community)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, affect economic development of country)