will: is hunting good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents order
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tonight
Weight: 0.31
, game show
Weight: 0.31
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31
, memorial day
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hunting good 1.00
is hunting 0.97
is hunting called 0.96
hunt 15 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(will, is hunting good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(will, is hunting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(will, is hunting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(will, is hunting)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(will, is hunting)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(will, is hunting called)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(will, hunt 15)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(will, hunt 15)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(will, hunt 15)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(will, is hunting called)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(will, is hunting called)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(will, is hunting called)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(will, hunt 15)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(will, is hunting good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(will, is hunting good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(will, is hunting good)