win: work in operations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.60
, fight
Weight: 0.59
Siblings victory
Weight: 0.65
, beat
Weight: 0.34
, defeat
Weight: 0.34
, playing game
Weight: 0.34
, play game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in operations 1.00
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(win, work in operations)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(win, work in operations)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fight, work)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(win, work in operations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fight, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(team, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(team, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fight, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(team, work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(win, work in operations)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(win, work in operations)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fight, work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(win, work in operations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(win, work in operations)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(win, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(win, work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(win, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(win, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(win, work in operations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fight, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(team, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fight, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(team, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(win, work in operations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)