winchester: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, town
Weight: 0.52
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.51
, public school
Weight: 0.51
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.29
, school district
Weight: 0.28
, school bus
Weight: 0.28
, village
Weight: 0.28
, quebec city
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(public school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(public school, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(school district, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(public school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(public school, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(school district, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(school district, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(winchester, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(winchester, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(public school, has quality better)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(school district, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(public school, has quality better)