wind instrument: be in keys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents percussion instrument
Weight: 0.83
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.80
, instrument
Weight: 0.66
, ensemble
Weight: 0.55
, sound
Weight: 0.49
Siblings bassoon
Weight: 0.71
, clarinet
Weight: 0.69
, oboe
Weight: 0.69
, saxophone
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in keys 1.00
be in different keys 0.96
be tuned to keys 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(instrument, be in different keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(musical instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(musical instrument, be in different keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, be in different keys)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, be in keys)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(instrument, be in keys)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(instrument, be in different keys)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, be in keys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, be in different keys)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be in keys)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be in different keys)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be tuned to keys)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, be in keys)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, be in different keys)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(musical instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(instrument, be in different keys)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(musical instrument, be in different keys)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(saxophone, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(saxophone, be in keys)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(saxophone, be in different keys)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(saxophone, be in different keys)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(wind instrument, be in keys)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in different keys)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wind instrument, be in different keys)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, be in different keys)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in different keys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(instrument, be in keys)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(musical instrument, be in keys)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(musical instrument, be in different keys)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(instrument, be in different keys)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to keys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(saxophone, be in keys)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(saxophone, be in different keys)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(instrument, be in keys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(musical instrument, be in keys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(musical instrument, be in different keys)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(instrument, be in different keys)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(wind instrument, be in keys)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to keys)