window: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.63
, operating system
Weight: 0.62
, location
Weight: 0.62
, bedroom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.83
, front door
Weight: 0.78
, window pane
Weight: 0.71
, wall
Weight: 0.65
, windshield
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(operating system, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(front door, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(window, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(front door, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(front door, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(windshield, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(windshield, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(window, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(operating system, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(windshield, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(front door, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(window, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(operating system, is expensive)