windshield: have dots

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.64
, safety glass
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.56
, damage
Weight: 0.55
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.39
, window pane
Weight: 0.36
, front door
Weight: 0.35
, wall
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dots 1.00
have black dots 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(windshield, have dots)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(windshield, have black dots)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(windshield, have black dots)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(windshield, have black dots)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(windshield, have black dots)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(windshield, have dots)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(windshield, have dots)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(windshield, have dots)