wine bottle: be at in cellar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents glass bottle
Weight: 0.86
, glass
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.73
, container
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings bottle opener
Weight: 0.36
, jug
Weight: 0.36
, champagne
Weight: 0.36
, beer mug
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in cellar 1.00
be at cellar 1.00
be at cupboard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(container, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be at in cellar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(container, be at cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(container, be at cupboard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(container, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, be at in cellar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wine bottle, be at in cellar)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be at cellar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, be at cellar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be at cellar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wine bottle, be at cellar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be at in cellar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wine bottle, be at in cellar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(container, be at cupboard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wine bottle, be at in cellar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(container, be at cupboard)