wine bottle: have labels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents glass bottle
Weight: 0.86
, glass
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.73
, container
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings shot glass
Weight: 0.37
, bottled water
Weight: 0.37
, bottle opener
Weight: 0.36
, broken glass
Weight: 0.36
, jug
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have labels 1.00
is labels 0.99
is label 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(glass bottle, is labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have labels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have labels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, have labels)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, is labels)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, is labels)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(glass bottle, is labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have labels)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have labels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wine bottle, have labels)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, is labels)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, is label)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, is labels)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wine bottle, is labels)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, is label)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wine bottle, is label)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wine bottle, is labels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wine bottle, is label)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have labels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(glass bottle, have labels)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is labels)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(glass bottle, have labels)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is labels)