wine cellar: be at good restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wine
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.67
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.39
, cellar
Weight: 0.38
, grape juice
Weight: 0.36
, madeira
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at good restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.95
be at fancy restaurant 0.87
be serve in fancy restaurant 0.84
be at resturant 0.84
be at bar 0.78
be at at hotel 0.78
be defined as plural of restaurant 0.77
be at hotel 0.77
be at shop mall 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wine, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(wine, be at bar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wine, be at bar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at resturant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at bar)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at bar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(room, be at at hotel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(laundry room, be at hotel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wine, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(laundry room, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(laundry room, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at shop mall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(laundry room, be at hotel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at shop mall)