wine cellar: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wine
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.67
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.39
, cellar
Weight: 0.38
, grape juice
Weight: 0.36
, madeira
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at good restaurant 0.95
be at fancy restaurant 0.86
be at resturant 0.85
be serve in fancy restaurant 0.83
be at at hotel 0.80
be at hotel 0.80
be at bar 0.79
be at shop mall 0.78
be defined as plural of restaurant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wine, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(wine, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wine, be at bar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at resturant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at bar)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at bar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(room, be at at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(laundry room, be at hotel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(wine, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wine, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wine, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(room, be at at hotel)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(laundry room, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(laundry room, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at good restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at fancy restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at shop mall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(laundry room, be at hotel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be at resturant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wine, be at bar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wine, be serve in fancy restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(room, be at at hotel)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(wine cellar, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at shop mall)