wine cellar: be at restrauant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wine
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.67
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.39
, cellar
Weight: 0.38
, grape juice
Weight: 0.36
, madeira
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restrauant 1.00
be at vinyard 1.00
be open at night 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wine, be at vinyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wine, be at vinyard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be open at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at vinyard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be open at night)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wine, be at vinyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be at restrauant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wine, be at vinyard)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(restaurant, be open at night)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wine, be at vinyard)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wine cellar, be at restrauant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(restaurant, be open at night)