wine cellar: be cold

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wine
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.67
, restaurant
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.39
, cellar
Weight: 0.38
, grape juice
Weight: 0.36
, madeira
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cold 1.00
be cold and dank 0.82
be good chill 0.82
be cool and dry 0.78
be cool and damp 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(wine, be good chill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(wine, be good chill)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wine, be good chill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(wine, be good chill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be cold)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be cold and dank)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be cool and damp)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be cool and dry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold and dank)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be cold and dank)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be cool and dry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cool and dry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cold and dank)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cool and dry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cool and damp)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wine cellar, be cool and damp)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cool and damp)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wine, be good chill)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(wine cellar, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wine, be good chill)