wine: age to perfection

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
age to perfection 1.00
age well 0.79
age with time 0.78
age over time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(wine, age to perfection)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wine, age well)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wine, age with time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wine, age over time)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wine, age well)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wine, age over time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(wine, age with time)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wine, age over time)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wine, age with time)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age with time)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wine, age well)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age over time)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wine, age well)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wine, age to perfection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, age to perfection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wine, age to perfection)