wine: age without lose taste

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
age without lose taste 1.00
age with time 0.81
age over time 0.81
be motivated by drink taste good 0.81
be used to taste 0.80
age well 0.78
be used to age wine 0.78
requires know your own limit no kiddding 0.77
age in bottle 0.76
requires get something to drink 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wine, age without lose taste)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drink, be used to taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wine, age without lose taste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drink, be used to taste)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drink, be used to taste)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be used to age wine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be motivated by drink taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine, age without lose taste)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drink, be used to taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wine, age without lose taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wine cellar, be used to age wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be used to age wine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(wine, age without lose taste)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wine, age in bottle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wine, age with time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wine, age over time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wine, age well)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wine, age over time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(wine, age with time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wine, age well)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wine, age in bottle)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wine, age over time)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wine, age with time)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age with time)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age over time)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wine, age in bottle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wine, age well)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wine, age well)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wine, age in bottle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wine, age without lose taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(drink, be used to taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be used to age wine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by drink taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(wine, age without lose taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(drink, be used to taste)