wine: be age in oak

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be age in oak 1.00
age in wooden cask 0.83
be used to age wine 0.83
be age in wine cellar 0.81
be age in cask 0.79
age in bottle 0.76
age over time 0.76
age with time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wine cellar, be used to age wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wine cellar, be used to age wine)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wine cellar, be used to age wine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wine, be age in oak)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wine, age in wooden cask)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wine, be age in wine cellar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wine, be age in cask)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(wine, age in wooden cask)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wine, age in wooden cask)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wine, age in bottle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wine, age in wooden cask)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wine, age with time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(wine, age over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wine, be age in cask)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wine, be age in cask)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(wine, be age in wine cellar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(wine, be age in cask)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wine, age over time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(wine, age with time)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wine, age in bottle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wine, be age in wine cellar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wine, age over time)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wine, age with time)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wine, age in bottle)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age over time)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, age with time)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wine, age in bottle)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wine, be age in wine cellar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be age in oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be age in oak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine cellar, be used to age wine)