wine: be expensive in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in california 1.00
be famous in california 0.95
be expensive in usa 0.85
be expensive in india 0.82
be expensive in thailand 0.81
be expensive in canada 0.81
be cheaper in europe 0.79
be expensive in singapore 0.77
be cheaper in france 0.77
be cheap in france 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wine, be expensive in california)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wine, be famous in california)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wine, be famous in california)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wine, be famous in california)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be famous in california)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wine, be cheaper in france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wine, be cheaper in france)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(wine, be cheap in france)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine, be cheap in france)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wine, be cheaper in france)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wine, be cheap in france)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wine, be cheap in france)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wine, be cheaper in france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wine, be expensive in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wine, be expensive in california)