wine: be tasty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tasty 1.00
be serve at fancy meal 0.76
be at spaghetti sauce 0.76
requires find something drinkable 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wine, be tasty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, requires find something drinkable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, requires find something drinkable)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wine, be tasty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(wine, be tasty)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wine, be at spaghetti sauce)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wine, be at spaghetti sauce)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wine, be at spaghetti sauce)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wine, be serve at fancy meal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wine, be at spaghetti sauce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wine, be tasty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wine, be tasty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drink, requires find something drinkable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(wine, be tasty)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drink, requires find something drinkable)