wine: get better with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
get better with age 1.00
taste better with age 0.90
age 0.85
be better than white 0.80
be better than water 0.79
be better than red 0.77
has age vintage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(drink, be better than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, get better with age)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(drink, be better than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drink, be better than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(drink, be better than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wine, get better with age)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(wine, get better with age)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wine, be better than red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine, be better than red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wine, be better than white)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, get better with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wine, get better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(drink, be better than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wine, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(drink, be better than water)