winger: be more decent than left wingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.65
, band
Weight: 0.50
, artist
Weight: 0.47
, striker
Weight: 0.44
, club
Weight: 0.42
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.35
, goalie
Weight: 0.34
, defender
Weight: 0.34
, hockey player
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more decent than left wingers 1.00
be more decent than wingers 0.99
score more than strikers 0.81
right call leftists cuck 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winger, be more decent than wingers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(winger, be more decent than wingers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than wingers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(winger, right call leftists cuck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(winger, score more than strikers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(winger, right call leftists cuck)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(winger, be more decent than wingers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(winger, score more than strikers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(winger, score more than strikers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(winger, right call leftists cuck)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(winger, score more than strikers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(winger, right call leftists cuck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winger, be more decent than left wingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)