winger: be more decent than wingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.65
, band
Weight: 0.50
, artist
Weight: 0.47
, striker
Weight: 0.44
, club
Weight: 0.42
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.35
, goalie
Weight: 0.34
, defender
Weight: 0.34
, hockey player
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more decent than wingers 1.00
be more decent than left wingers 0.99
score more than strikers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(winger, be more decent than wingers)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(winger, score more than strikers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winger, be more decent than left wingers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(winger, score more than strikers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(winger, score more than strikers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(winger, score more than strikers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winger, be more decent than wingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(winger, be more decent than wingers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(winger, be more decent than wingers)